There are many different issues regarding creation and evolution, and lots of different versions or models that people believe.

Sometimes evolution is referred to as "science" and "creationism" is referred to as religion. However, it is probably more appropriate to refer to both as concepts or models regarding the origins of life.

'Science' as a word is often misused or misquoted. Science is about observable and repeatable processes in the present. Molecules to man evolution is neither observable or repeatable, therefore it is not scientific, but philosophical. How is a reptile turning into a bird 150 million years ago observable or repeatable?

By definition, models about the beginning of the Universe are not scientific, they are conjecture based on limited information.

Often evolutionists have a materialistic or naturalistic agenda that excludes God - this is not scientific, but a philosophical starting point that provides a strong bias when interpreting evidence.

Several of the models (including Theistic evolution) state the Universe is billions of years old and mankind first appeared around 50,000- 200,000 years ago. This is towards the end of the timeline, not the beginning, as shown in the diagram. Jesus states in Mark 10:6 "But at the beginning of creation God 'made them male and female.'" If we start from the Bible and believe it has authority as God's spoken word, it is difficult to reconcile this verse with all of the models, other than Young Earth Creationism.