Atheistic Evolution
Atheistic Evolution is the belief that there is no God and that the Theory of Evolution describes how life, the Universe and everything evolved from nothing.
Strictly, it is not a scientific theory - a theory is proven, evolution is not.
The Big Bang model states that nothing exploded into something. Whereas the Bible refers to God creating - Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." The Hebrew word that is used here for "created" is "bara", which means created from nothing.
In a 1996 paper published in the journal "Developmental Biology", the evolutionist biologists Scott Gilbert, John Opitz and Rudolf Raff stated that: "The Modern Synthesis is a remarkable achievement. However, starting in the 1970s, many biologists began questioning its adequacy in explaining evolution. Genetics might be adequate for explaining microevolution, but micro-evolutionary changes in gene frequency were not seen as able to turn a reptile into a mammal or to convert a fish into an amphibian. Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern only the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest. As Goodwin (1995) points out, "the origin of species—Darwin's problem—remains unsolved."
Molecules to man evolution is a philosophical idea about the unobservable and unrepeatable past - it requires an increase in genetic information and function , which is not observed in real life. A change in trait may be caused by a mutation, but this is not evidence of molecules to man evolution, this is devolution.

graphic
Atheistic Evolution is not scientific although many people will not acknowledge this truth. Dr George Wald, Professor of Biology, Harvard University and Nobel prize winner in the field of Biology said "When it comes to the origin of life, we have only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility...Spontaneous generation was scientifically disproved one hundred years ago by Louis Pasteur, Spellanzani, Reddy and others. That leads us scientifically to only one possible conclusion -- that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God...I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution." - Scientific American, August, 1954.
Notice that he says that he cannot accept creation on philosophical grounds, not on scientific grounds.
In 1980 at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, many of the world’s leading evolutionary experts gathered for a conference on evolution. The following statement was reported: "The central question of the Chicago conference was whether mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. At risk of doing violence to the positions of some of the people at the meeting, the answer can be given as a clear, 'No.'" (reported by Roger Levin in the journal, Science, Vol. 210).
There are something like 3 billion DNA "letters" within each human cell nucleus providing far more function and structure than the "simplest" organisms which contain about half a million "letters" - that's 6,000 times less. There are no observations that support an increase in this complexity.